New Special Issue on Agroecology Transformations: Connecting the dots to enable agroecology transformations

This special issue on Agroecology Transformations, published today in Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, includes six articles sharing new insights into the process and kinds of transformations needed to enable agroecology as a model for a more just and sustainable food system.

Agroecology is coming into its own as an alternative paradigm to corporate-led industrial food systems. Evidence of the advantages, benefits, impacts, and multiple functions of agroecology abounds (see: HLPE 2019 for a review). For many the evidence is clear: agroecology, together with ‘food sovereignty’, offer a pathway for more just and sustainable food systems and communities. The questions that remain are about how to foster the enabling conditions, and mitigate the disabling ones, so that agroecology can flourish (Anderson et al. 2020; See here for research brief of our work on Agroecology Transformations).

Research in Northeast India on Sustainability Transitions, Organic Agriculture Policy and Agroecology (Meek and Anderson 2020)

There has been a good deal of recent debate about agroecology transitions, transformations, massification, amplification, as well as how to “scale up” and“scale out” agroecology as a new paradigm for food and agriculture. This new thinking and research could not be more relevant in the context of deepening ecological and social crises (IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) 2019; IPCC 2018; World Inequality Lab 2018). It is in this context that we have been bringing together allied researchers, activists, food producers and policy-makers in our work at AgroecologyNow at the UK-based Center for Agroecology, Water and Resilience ( As a community of practice, we have been examining the contours of this growing body of work on agroecology transformations and probing its edges and horizons.

This special issue is a part of this collective work to broaden the discussion on agroecological transitions. Some of the articles (Dale 2020; Meek and Anderson 2020; Siegner, Acey, and Sowerwine 2020) were amongst twenty-one papers and panels in a stream of sessions we coordinated on ‘Agroecology Transformations’ at the American Association of Geographers meeting in Washington, DC in April 2019.

International convening of allies in our network of people working to enable agroecology, food sovereignty and social justice around the world.

Meek and Anderson’s article was further developed in a retreat hosted by AgroecologyNow in which we convened a group of twenty-five researchers, activists, farmers and organizers from around the world involved in research and knowledge co-production that aims to advance movements for agroecology and food sovereignty. Other articles (Schiller et al.2020; Tornaghi and Dehaene 2020) arose in response to a call for papers distributed through our networks.

The five articles in this special issue provide new insights into agroecological transformations. The focus of Siegner, Acey, and Sowerwine (2020) and Tornaghi and Dehaene (2020) on agroecology in an urban context are welcome contributions in a field often dominated by research in rural areas. The role of the State in transitions-transformation features in two articles. Schiller et al.’s (2020) analysis shows how agroecology has been largely co-opted by regime actors in Nicaragua. Similarly, Meek and Anderson (2020) articulate how the visions and processes of scaling deployed by the Sikemese State in the organic transition are predominantly promoting homogeneity, productivism and market-oriented processes of transition. These two papers show how state-centric processes of transition can often under- mine the radical potential of agroecology. Finally, Bryan Dale’s (2020) article written in the Canadian context argues for the importance of alliances across boundaries (e.g. environmentalists, food producers, farm workers, Indigenous peoples, etc.) as the basis for a bottom-up process of agroecological scaling.

Here we want to draw attention to the range of collections that have recently been published on agrocological transitions, and acknowledge the influence they have had on our work. The articles contained within each collection examine agroecology in diverse contexts and explore different layers and modes of engagement. When viewed as a coherent body of work, they ask important questions about the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for the creation of food systems underpinned by social justice, solidarity, reciprocity and trust. The following are just nine such collections and contributions in an ever-burgeoning field of emerging agroecological thinking and action:

The flow of ideas and questions raised in these publications are again only a partial reflection of a larger body of work produced by different authors and groups that we are connected to through the work of the AgroecologyNow network. Of course, the majority of the thinking, action and change-making related to agroe- cology and food sovereignty is taking place in communities and social movements through a vast array of diverse initiatives. Social movement processes are critical in opening deliberative spaces, advancing popular education that re-values diverse knowledge dialogues, and creating enabling conditions for food producers and local communities. The Declaration of the International Forum on Agroecology provides an important reference point for the thinking emerging from social movements (Nyéléni Movement for Food Sovereignty 2015).

This special issue, and the wider work of AgroecologyNow, has been a rich co- generative experience that has allowed and enabled us to articulate not only what we want to work on, but how we want to work. In contributing to agroecology and food sovereignty praxis (Levkoe, Brem-Wilson, and Anderson 2018) as a collective we are keenly aware of our responsibility to be reflexive and self-critical. To this end, we continue to think deeply about our theories of change, our values and principles, and the different roles that we can and do play in enabling agroecology transformations in the food sovereignty movement at large (Duncan et al. 2019). This includes avoiding approaches that co-opt or disable bottom-up and people-driven processes. As a group, we have identified that our most powerful form of intervention is to work in close collaboration with knowledge mobilizers engaged in social transformation. Much of our work reflects and analyzes participatory processes, methodologies and pedagogies and centers on a critical analysis of political transformation as the basis for change. Some of the ways that we see how our work is contributing to processes of transformational change in collaboration with our networks include:

  • Co-designing research and learning processes
  • Engaging as critical friends with the social movements
  • Collaborating with and directly supporting practice and social movements
  • Organizing and systematizing evidence
  • Amplifying grassroots voices
  • Contributing to shaping discourses and narratives
  • Participating in and informing policy processes

Sharing food, embracing conviviality and a commitment to a reflexive and caring way of working are core to our values.

Our collective is made up of people with different interests, foci and positionalities but is based on a constellation of shared values and politics. As a part of our own ongoing process of coming together and working reflexively, we have mapped out the unfolding values that underpin our collective (figure 1). These values form the basis of an ongoing journey of connecting with one another and beyond, through reflexive cycles of action-learning. We invite you to engage with us ( to see where our values and work align, and where these connections can help further our collective project of agroecology transformations toward a more just and sustainable world.

Figure 1. A working representation of the constellation of values that underpins the work of the AgroecologyNow collective.


We would like to thank Steve Gliessman and the Journal of Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems for the support and guidance throughout the process of putting together this special issue. It has been a pleasure. We would also extend our gratitude to the Cultivate! collective, particularly Janneke Bruil, for their important contributions to the AgroecologyNow collective. The generous support of Coventry University and the Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, as well as the research support staff and other research colleagues at CAWR have been vital to this work.


Anderson, C. R., R. Binimelis, M. P. Pimbert, and M. G. Rivera-Ferre. 2019. Introduction to the symposium on critical adult education in food movements: Learning for transformation in and beyond food movements—The why, where, how and the what next? Agriculture and Human Values36 (3):521–29. doi:10.1007/s10460-019-09941-2.

Anderson, C. R., J. Bruil, M. J. Chappell, C. Kiss, and M. P. Pimbert. 2020. From transition to domains of transformation: Getting to sustainable and just food systems through agroecology. Sustainability 11 (19):1–28.

Bergez, J. E., E. Audouin, and O. Therond, Eds. 2019. Agroecological transitions: From theory to practice in local participatory design. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Côte, F.-X., E. Poirier-Magona, S. Perret, P. Roudier, B. Rapidel, and M.-C. Thirion, Eds. 2018. The agroecological transition of agricultural systems in the Global South. Versailles. Paris: CIRAD.

CSM. 2019. Without feminism there is no agroecology. Towards healthy, sustainable and just food systems. An input and vision paper of the CSM working group of Women. Rome: Civil Society and Indigenous Peoples Mechanism (CSM).

Dale, B. 2020. Alliances for agroecology: From climate change to food system change. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44(5). in this issue.

Duncan, J., P. Claeys, M. Rivera-Ferre, E. Oteros-Rozas, B. Van Dyck, C. Plank, and A. A. Desmarais.2019. Scholar-activists in an expanding European food sovereignty movement. Journal of Peasant Studies In Press, 1–26. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1675646.

Ferguson, B. G., M. A. Maya, O. Giraldo, T. G. Cacho, M. M. y, H. Morales, and P. Rosset. 2019. Special issue editorial: What do we mean by agroecological scaling? Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 43 (7–8):722–23. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1630908.

HLPE. 2019. Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A report by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome: FAO.

IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. UNEP and UNESCO. Bonn, Germany: IPBES Secretariat.

IPCC. 2018. Summary for policymakers. In Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, ed. V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.- O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, et al., 32. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.

IPES-Food. 2018. Breaking away from industrial food and farming systems: Seven case studies of agroecological transition. Brussels: International Panel of Experts in Sustainable Food Systems.

Levkoe, C. Z., J. Brem-Wilson, and C. R. Anderson. 2018. People, power, change: Three pillars of a food sovereignty research praxis. The Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (7):1389–412. doi:10.1080/ 03066150.2018.1512488.

Meek, D., and C. R. Anderson. 2020. Scale and the politics of the organic transition in Sikkim, India.Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44(5). in this issue.

Nyéléni Movement for Food Sovereignty. 2015. Declaration of the international forum for agroecology. Nyeleni Forum for Food Sovereignty. Accessed November 22, 2019. https://foodsovereigntyalliance.

Oteros-Rozas, E., F. Ravera, and M. García-Llorente. 2019. How does agroecology contribute to the transitions towards social-ecological sustainability? Sustainability 11 (16):4372. doi:10.3390/ su11164372.

Pimbert, M. P., and G. Borrini-Feyerabend 2019. Nourishing life – territories of life and food sovereignty. Policy brief of the ICCA consortium no. 6., ICCA consortium, centre for agroecology, water and resilience at coventry university and CENESTA, Tehran. Accessed December 10, 2019. https://www. Food-Sovereignty.pdf.

Schiller, K., W. Godek, L. Klerkx, and P. M. Poortvliet. 2020. Nicaragua’s agroecological transition: Transformation or reconfiguration of the agri-food regime?. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44(5). in this issue.

Siegner, A. B., C. Acey, and J. Sowerwine. 2020. Producing urban agroecology in the east bay: From soil health to community empowerment. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44(5). in this issue. Tornaghi, C., and M. Dehaene. 2020. The prefigurative power of urban political agroecology: Rethinking the urbanisms of agroecological transitions for food system transformation. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44(5). in this issue.

World Inequality Lab. 2018. World Inequality Report. Accessed December 16, 2020.

M. P. Pimbert, M. J. Chappell, J. Brem-Wilson, P. Claeys, C. Kiss, C. Maughan, J. Milgroom, G. McAllister, N. Moeller and J. Singh The Agroecology Now Collective, Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, UK